Why you should pay for Financial Advice

Paying a service fee is important.

Other ways of charging for financial advice create conflicts of interest.

Conflicts of interest regarding remuneration increase the chances of non-compliant (so bad it’s illegal) advice by 6 times.

Of the latest ASIC study into the provision of financial advice, only 3% of advice was classified as good; of this small category 100% of the clients were charged a flat fee for service.

We often hear the counter argument that asset based fees align the planner’s results and therefore incentives with their clients’; but in our opinion the results do not back that up, a major reason for this is that the most suitable financial strategy may not involve accumulating a financial product, which means the financial planner has a conflict of interest, the best example of this is the strategy of reducing debt rather than building an investment portfolio (that may pay an asset based fee)

From the ASIC report:
“The 25 cases (38% of those assessed) of poor advice all involved poor strategic advice…This commonly included the failure of advisers to address areas that did not directly involve investment products.”

Get A Free GeekPeek

  • A GeekPeek is a free, special financial check-up that will look at all areas of your financial health and tell you exactly where the problems are.
  • You'll get a custom report on your finances and where the problems are and what you could get by fixing them.
  • And best of all, it's totally free and no-obligation. You can even keep the report if you want.
GeekPeek from MoneyGeeks
MoneyGeeks

To book your GeekPeek, just click the button below.


Book A Free GeekPeek Today